I haven't played Warrior since moltdown, true, I generally stopped playing Warriors after seeing Ret. Paladins doing more damage with their dots so I cba play the class; I don't care if you're the highest MMR warrior, if anything, I've seen better warriors (Sereneblade) farm impossibly to beat teams as a warrior, but what does your MMR have to do with you being your warrior? I don't care if you played at 2.5+ mmr, that's literally the new normal bracket for sub-to-average decent players, what are you getting at? You can go ahead and say you are 2.5 mmr, but at the end of the day, they're just going to look at you being a 2.3 Warrior (in fact, I was actually a 2.3 warrior in 4.0.6 in 3s, but that's a different story). 2.2 is the highest 2s achievement, yet Warmane 'nerfed' the arena system so that you gain more points overall, hence, why you're able to get a 3s title even though you are a sub-average player. If you ACTUALLY played 4.0.6 or 4.3.4 (earliest seasons of it) you would know how realistic and difficult it was to actually get 2200, not 20 wins, it actually took 100+ games to win with your MMR and that's with queueing with people at your MMR too.
Yes, keep gloating about your non-impressive 10 win Rival title, I'm truly impressed, you made an impression of us all, actually. You're clearly not a Rank 1 player, I already proved that, but if you want, we can log Warsong so we can measure how big our genitals are (inb4 warsong dead realm, i don't play it anymore either).
btw guys, MMR>Rating, because I played at 2500 mmr and I got farmed down to 2300 MMR, but I indeed did play at 2500 that's what counts, not my rating, because I require special attention because I play hard classes boo hoo ):
cya at 2.3 mmr again lmfao