Multiboxing horde. I thought this wasn't allowed in PvP?
http://postimg.org/image/6qs61bxsh/
http://postimg.org/image/ho79vbopd/
'); document.write(''); var yuipath = 'clientscript/yui'; var yuicombopath = ''; var remoteyui = false; } else // Load Rest of YUI remotely (where possible) { var yuipath = 'https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/yui/2.9.0/build'; var yuicombopath = ''; var remoteyui = true; if (!yuicombopath) { document.write(''); } } var SESSIONURL = "s=a2bd9486023c7b0c8f2d20488cbd9540&"; var SECURITYTOKEN = "guest"; var IMGDIR_MISC = "warmane/misc"; var IMGDIR_BUTTON = "warmane/buttons"; var vb_disable_ajax = parseInt("0", 10); var SIMPLEVERSION = "422"; var BBURL = "https://forum.warmane.com"; var LOGGEDIN = 0 > 0 ? true : false; var THIS_SCRIPT = "showthread"; var RELPATH = "showthread.php?t=330385&p=2676034"; var PATHS = { forum : "", cms : "", blog : "" }; var AJAXBASEURL = "https://forum.warmane.com/"; var CoTTooltips = { rename: true, icons: false, iconsize: 15, qualitycolor: true, overridecolor: { spells: '#839309', items: '', npcs: '#fff', objects: '#fff', quests: '#ffb100', achievements: '#fff' } }; // -->
Multiboxing horde. I thought this wasn't allowed in PvP?
http://postimg.org/image/6qs61bxsh/
http://postimg.org/image/ho79vbopd/
How many more of these threads do we need? Multiboxing was allowed on retail and it's allowed here.
Besides I keep seeing horde complain about "always losing WG" in their global almost every night, lol.
Considering you had to pay for each of those accounts on retail, I don't really see that as a valid argument for the reasoning, not that I have anything against multiboxing.
As for the thread, Alliance does typical win more Wintergrasps from my perspective unless the graveyards decide to bug and give a free win to the other side. Having said that, multiboxers in PvP are easy to beat if you gang up on them. 5 Shamans? Here's a tip, don't run in there thinking you can kill them solo like you're some PvP god.
Well, a mulitboxer is not difficult to kill in a WG and a SOA. Just use the cannons and you kill the multiboxer in 2-3 hits. Easy. This is not the reason.
Yep,those are my shamans,i maybe won once on my own.Other then that,people ***** cuz they try to solo 5vs1.
Pointless.
This what people don't do in PvP when they face a multiboxer.
This the stupid crap they do instead. I can't tell you how many times I've seen some Smourne warrior try to bladestorm way through a boxer only to get melted by 5 Flame Shocks then Lava Bursts.
You should see what it's like to be horde in AV.
They even made a forum only for multiboxers... lmfao. Should do some research.
http://forum.warmane.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189
I don't think why alliance has been crying about the WG losses. It seems to change everyday so obviously someone is winning from both sides. You just can't wi them all so it might just be bad luck that horde has it when you are playing.
I don't know why you would think that. It is allowed. Here is an explanation on why it is allowed amongst other stuff: http://forum.warmane.com/showthread.php?t=330004
The only difference money really makes is that on retail multiboxers were more uncommon than on private servers. I don't think blizzard just went: "Oh well they are not very common and give us this amount of money so multiboxing is fine." The ammount of money multiboxers bring to blizzard is just a drop in the ocean compared to singleboxers and I think that the main reasons behind allowing multiboxing has nothing to do with money. Ofcourse, I wasn't there when they decided about multiboxing so I guess it's possible that they were rubbing their hands together while giggling with dollarsigns as their eyes. But based on blue posts on blizzard forums I'd say the main reason is that multiboxing is not against the terms of service and there is no reason to not allow it. This is also why I think that his argument is at least to some point valid. Also it's nice to remind players that multiboxing is not just #privateserverthings.Considering you had to pay for each of those accounts on retail, I don't really see that as a valid argument for the reasoning, not that I have anything against multiboxing.