I kinda disagree with this statement "titles doesnt means anything". Actually it means alot. It means that Dwal, Emil, Psiho etc got alot of knowledge of their class and spec as any other spec that they are facing, that they mastered their teamplay and that they would be alot higher rated then any of us without a title on retail. It pleases me to watch them play even the duels, because they got their timings for using cooldowns, they know when to play offensive or deffensive. Just because me, u or any other player out there didn't want/got the title its pointless to say it doesn't mean anything. Just compare one gladiator as Meltgibson (horde, fire mage) to some random mage out there, and you will see the difference. Same as that random mage plays this game for fun, Melt or Emil or Dwal play it also for fun, cause if they took it too serious they would probably go and play it on retail. And those arguments "titles doesnt mean sh*t, i didnt tryharded for the title etc" seems to be unfair to those who keep the r1 multiple seasons, and it indirectly means "oh emil is tryharding just to keep the title, i got my 2.x team and disbandoned it, Im too pro to get the title, let the tryhards get it" and actually the case is completely different.
So now on-topic, just because Tclick won 1 rbg vs Neuro (who got his title) it doesnt mean that Neuro is bad. Actually he is better than the most of FATALITY members who called him bad. So just because of the 1 win you will call someone who has achieved much more in this game on this realm - bad. Doesnt seem fair tbh, because that same team left rbg when we sniped them in TP, when u got carried few games by Neuro or when u dodged inv for rbg with stupid excuses and right away qued vs your other guild on alliance. Oh no, that is not a wintrading at all...
Ps. this green frog should be nelth sub-forum moderator. He share oppinion with the most of nelth players.plox