Yup, bad move here. Removing drake from 2s rewards makes no sense.
Why in the hell would you deprive good players of a mount? Does that achieve something?
If this is made to promote 3s, I can tell you the impact will be very low.
'); document.write(''); var yuipath = 'clientscript/yui'; var yuicombopath = ''; var remoteyui = false; } else // Load Rest of YUI remotely (where possible) { var yuipath = 'https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/yui/2.9.0/build'; var yuicombopath = ''; var remoteyui = true; if (!yuicombopath) { document.write(''); } } var SESSIONURL = "s=8d0bce164edcc0662952b2a84ab5294d&"; var SECURITYTOKEN = "guest"; var IMGDIR_MISC = "warmane/misc"; var IMGDIR_BUTTON = "warmane/buttons"; var vb_disable_ajax = parseInt("0", 10); var SIMPLEVERSION = "422"; var BBURL = "https://forum.warmane.com"; var LOGGEDIN = 0 > 0 ? true : false; var THIS_SCRIPT = "showthread"; var RELPATH = "showthread.php?t=354638&p=2814885&viewfull=1"; var PATHS = { forum : "", cms : "", blog : "" }; var AJAXBASEURL = "https://forum.warmane.com/"; var CoTTooltips = { rename: true, icons: false, iconsize: 15, qualitycolor: true, overridecolor: { spells: '#839309', items: '', npcs: '#fff', objects: '#fff', quests: '#ffb100', achievements: '#fff' } }; // -->
Yup, bad move here. Removing drake from 2s rewards makes no sense.
Why in the hell would you deprive good players of a mount? Does that achieve something?
If this is made to promote 3s, I can tell you the impact will be very low.
(Could not find how to edit a reply)
Besides, it's statistically more difficult to get r1 in 2s.
In 5s, 5 people are at r1. In 3s, 3 people, and in 2s, only 2. If anything, players should receive MORE rewards in 2s than in 3s ;)
Is this a typo or is this season being extended compared to others?
Extended, because ppl complained about short seasons (3monthes). It seems, that it's almost 5 monthes now (30th of March)
Kind regards
Why do rank 1-3 in 2s earn gladiator title? Wasn't it much better when only rank 1 did? When 3 teams are getting glad per season it creates the problem Icecrown has; everyone is a gladiator. Unless you start removing titles (non-seaonal) after a season.
It's season 8 of WARMANE (so every servers) not In-Game season.
I totally agree.
Actually considering Outland's population and the fact every bracket was considered competitive on TBC, maybe it is good to give 5v5 a chance. In case that the result show the bracket was active during the season you should reward the players somehow.
u forgot that playing braindead bracket a.k.a 2v2 is "statistically" easier, so players should receive less or even none rewards in 2v2
Someone doesn't know what is TBC
So in order to get for cataclysm 3v3 gladiator title you need to be 2000 or 2000+ rating so if you are 1.5k-1.6k and first you wont get title ? or if you will what title will it be? and will yuo get mount magic rooster
ye, tell me now, that TBC pvp > Wotlk pvp lol
So did i missed something or season that started 30th March will end up 20th August?
And no Glad titles for 2s? (Talking about Wotlk/Cata)
Like wtf...
I personally think most the people here are right. You guys should give r1 titles + mount and for 2-5 or 2-10 give glad + mount and take away glad title after season ends. Why not do it this way? Don't know how or something? The server population is 15k so restricting rewards to 10 people is kind of a dumb idea. Top 25 people should get titles/rewards.