Burning Crusade Differences in WOTLK and TBC warrior

[Garun]

damn that sucks a lot, i guess wotlk was really good for warrior

LOL NO for prot warrior. They got shafted hard going from the best MT in TBC to the worst raid tank in WotLK.

[bigbazz]

LOL NO for prot warrior. They got shafted hard going from the best MT in TBC to the worst raid tank in WotLK.

You mean worst raid tank for ICC? Because they weren't the worst raid tank in WOTLK. WOTLK is an entire expansion that included patches with many class/item/stat changes across 4 raid tiers. The expansion is not boiled down to patch 3.3.2 and ICC.

[Garun]

You mean worst raid tank for ICC? Because they weren't the worst raid tank in WOTLK. WOTLK is an entire expansion that included patches with many class/item/stat changes across 4 raid tiers. The expansion is not boiled down to patch 3.3.2 and ICC.

That is irrelevant when virtually every server is using 3.3.4 classes and prot warrior is the worst with those. Unless they did some unblizzlike buffs to balance them, they aren't viable for ICC 25H (until like 15%+ of the buff).

[bigbazz]

That is irrelevant when virtually every server is using 3.3.4 classes and prot warrior is the worst with those. Unless they did some unblizzlike buffs to balance them, they aren't viable for ICC 25H (until like 15%+ of the buff).

They aren't viable? What a load of ****, history shows they were viable even if not best. And when comparing to WOTLK not everyone is comparing to private servers, they are comparing to WOTLK, actual WOTLK. I mean it's not like Method were using a Warrior main tank right? Oh right they were. Same thing with Ensidia, Kungen was playing Prot Warrior on progression.

There is a huge difference between best and viable.