Usually 35% of the active arena players get titles to encourage many players to go for rankings. Here on Warmane top 10 teams get titles.
Whoever thought this was a good idea in this situation should have looked at the ladders.
Lets take Ragnaros realm. Players in 2v2 at 2,4k rating dont get any title. In 3v3 on Ragnaros the team on rank10 is at 1329 rating and rang 11 is at 1181 rating. This team @rank 10 could have stayed at 1182 rating and would still have gotten a rival title for being in "top 10". Wow. This team even has stats like 39 wins and 41 losses. Double-wow. This is the same title as the "top 3" team at 1873 rating receives. This isnt much rating either, but should at least be more valued than 1,2-1,3k rating.
I am surprised this is the best idea the team came up with. Its ok to encourage players to play 3v3 but it obviously failed horribly on all WotlK servers except Blackrock maybe. Setting Gladiator to 2k is nice, but doesnt help the fact that even these few 2k teams didnt even have any opponent to prove themselves against. Farming low geared players who want 10 fast losses for points can be done by any geared player. Arenatitles should show how experienced a player is but 1,2-1,4k rating is nothing since you start at 1,5k mmr.
Please rethink you current version of giving arenatitles for future seasons if you too think 1,3k rating is not worth a title, even in 3v3.
