1v1 tournaments favor priests/paladins.

Most classes stand zero chance of beating a shadow priest or ret paladin 1v1 in arena.

And dont get me started on warlocks with teleport and blades edge arena.

Why are these 1v1 tournaments held in arena?

It makes so much more sense as far as balance, and giving every class a chance to win, to not have them in arena.

Most specs have almost zero chance to win because of this.

I just dont get it, I mean arena is ment for 2v2 3v3 and 5v5, not for 1v1.

Continue to watch paladins and priests dominate these events, because your only chance to win is if a good ret paladin or priest is not in the tournament.

They should mix arenas with Los and Without (f.e. gurubashi). dunno if its possible to implement.
At this very moment 1vs1 tournament is "Who is the best at pillar licking".
Last time shadow priest and elemental shaman were dueling for like 20 minutes, most boring tournament i have ever seen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Topikaa

They should mix arenas with Los and Without (f.e. gurubashi). dunno if its possible to implement.
At this very moment 1vs1 tournament is "Who is the best at pillar licking".
Last time shadow priest and elemental shaman were dueling for like 20 minutes, most boring tournament i have ever seen.

---

How to spectate a tournament?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fiutolog

How to spectate a tournament?

---

There is a live stream on section right when 1vs1 is up.

You are totally right.

Those classes have HUGE advantage with LoS, while others have basically zero chance.

1v1 tournaments should also be held in area with no LoS, like Dire Maul or Gurubashi, at least half of the times, to make it more balanced and fair.

Some may argue that retri sucks in open space, but guess how well an hunter could perform vs a spriest with pillars avaiable.... yea right.