To very shortly reiterate, it is of our strong believe that this is a different case. No matter how much you wish to paint the players as 'smart' 'cunning', it's still very easy to use a spell you have as a class.
Just because a certain spell is not in often use, it does not mean someone can't accidentally press a keybind or even press a keybind a dozen times and do something. There's a core different between using a hacking program and simply using the abilities your class has.
With the idea of how easy this can happen and if we were to set up some form of a logging system that alarms us every time it's being used on Lich King we would swiftly and without any doubt ban the 90% of the raiding scene in less than a week.
It's the same thing as transmog, it's unfair and not nice but it can happen accidentally. We can't start banning everyone simple because they happen to have that on their characters.
We as staff can't differentiate if it was used intentionally or not and understand that it can be used accidentally, therefore we refrain from banning the involved. If it was evidence where the raid leader instructed a player to do so and other players in the raid encouraged it we would see it with different eyes.
With the things as they are, we feel that issuing a ban is unfair, unjust and not honourable from our side.
You're still and many others are still not understanding the gravity of the situation and not understanding the idea between incidental and intentional exploit. Warrior exploits are intentional, you have to work your way around to have them. Same thing with a lot of things, you have to put effort into getting them done and there's a clear line between wanting to do it or not.
We can't assume this was intentional because it's so easy to do. We can't assume the player is a tyrannical, evil, cunning figure because then we wouldn't be fair. We assume everyone is innocent and work from that point. If you continue comparing this to further complicated exploits, hacking programs and grave issues that are not removed permanently from the servers only because of staff's good will and hope and belief in human nature then we have nothing further to discuss.
Writing this again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasumii
Also, since when are we to assume what a player should have on their bars or not? Would that be difference between the actual ban or not? No.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proterean
The overall point of my replies, comparisons and examples went over everyone's head. The key point is that we will not ban players for issues that can arise accidentally and especially when there's no evidence that one such thing was done intentionally.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasumii
Speaking about honour and taking responsibility is important however we did not take responsibility for cheaters or exploiters. We merely took responsibility for not fixing it sooner. Exploiters will still get banned and will always be banned however when an issue like this which can be abused very simply and we cannot differentiate if the player was innocent or not, we have to refrain from banning. It's that simple. Going to write this again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proterean

