Share something pointless about your life!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ricks

And btw, the Rogue comment is wrong too.

---

"No matter how much you think you know about WoW pvp there will always be a rogue to contradict you". ( and his gf :p )

Lezbi honest, if a rogue isn't stacking ArP and the Pala knows his CD's, the pala has much more burst (even tho the rogue has much more sustainable damage), enough to global a rogue that let's say didn't use evasion/cloak on time.

But that was not the point.
I like the game being balanced around 1v1 because that means there are no "bad matchups" and all of your losses are due to the other player being objectively better than you. I understand that some may not like this, but again, I'm talking about my opinion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Obnoxious

How do we go from talking about small asses to outdated games with cartoonish graphics?

Spoiler: Show

http://i.imgur.com/IH3J0vE.jpg

---

You need a woman in your life.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Radvo

You need a woman in your life.

---

You more than once change the subject from "nice female asses" to "World of Warcraft class balance," yet I'm the one who needs a woman.

I have my priorities set.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Obnoxious

You more than once change the subject from "nice female asses" to "World of Warcraft class balance," yet I'm the one who needs a woman.

---

Can't argue that women's asses > wow class balance
Anyway I memorized the first string. zzaaatazzcbjzcsazzcjzzjzs
hooray

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Radvo

I have my priorities set.

---

You need a woman son.

Just popping in to say asses > wow

EDIT: Women asses. Nice ones.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by unbanned

You need a woman son.

---

Most of us here,probably

Speaking of which...

Is it a good idea to talk to a complete (attractive :D) stranger on the bus? She uses earbugs, so I guess that's a (-) ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Djokula

Most of us here,probably

---

Bit of a wild assumption.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hugolich

Is it a good idea to talk to a complete (attractive :D) stranger on the bus? She uses earbugs, so I guess that's a (-) ?

---

It'll probably just piss her off that she has to take them out to talk to someone, but sure go for it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hugolich

Is it a good idea to talk to a complete (attractive :D) stranger on the bus? She uses earbugs, so I guess that's a (-) ?

---

Do it. Hopefully the experience will teach you better. Never engage complete strangers in public places. It annoys me so much to be bothered by randoms on the street, regardless of reasons. And if you aren't unnaturally attractive, you have no chance to get anyone through that method. Do you think she can be arsed enough to spend her ride answering your advances and playing nice for you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by unbanned

Bit of a wild assumption.



It'll probably just piss her off that she has to take them out to talk to someone, but sure go for it.

---

I did said most of us,not all XD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheClam

Never engage complete strangers in public places. It annoys me so much to be bothered by randoms on the street, regardless of reasons.

---

Oh you would so hate me ;)

@Hugolich it's probably too late but I'd say go get her tiger!
Maybe she's tired and bored of listening to the same ol' playlist which she had created milleniums ago and is just waiting for a brave guy to put her out of her misery. Plus she will finally have someone to not only get her Ex jeallous with but also have the opportunity to get her Facebook status page filled for the next few weeks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Djokula

I did said most of us,not all XD

---

What's up with you people and semantics?

half the posts here are "I said that, not that."

Haven't realised how fun Osu is until today..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheClam

What's up with you people and semantics?

half the posts here are "I said that, not that."

---

What's with you misusing the term "semantics" when what people do is clarify when they are misinterpreted/misrepresented?