That kind of answer has 9 out of 10 chances to mean it barely goes further down from your collarbone and nowhere close to any cleavage.
Printable View
You're comparing highly skilled individuals that have not only graduated college, but proven themselves in the job field and are not easily replaceable compared to you who last I checked was working in the entry level stuff where eight million people apply. Employers want the best individual to represent their business, it's not rocket appliances. Someone with a ****ty tattoo on their hand looks far worse than someone without tattoos. Entry level people are replaceable and most of them handle customers, a surgeon or teacher isn't replaceable and have demonstrated the skills they need. Entry level needs no skills and can be replaced in a second.
And yet nearly half of "entry level" employees here have visible tattoos and or facial piercings. Society here is very liberal, and we have freedom of expression no matter the workplace, regardless of profession.
Maybe in the next half a century some of the more developed countries will follow suit and remove such form of discrimination too.
Obnoxious, I don't know you at all, I seriously have no idea about anything about yourself, but I could almost feel your annoyance boiling.
Sometimes I dream that I'm Matt Preston.
Well, I did say a chance of 9 out of 10. So, sure, show me.
Eh... I don't follow. A woman is talking about her chest tattoo and offering to show me it, and that would make me feel "boiling annoyance"? Are you projecting how you'd feel in my situation instead, maybe? I know chicks with tattoos don't do it for everyone. Even just women don't do it for some... so I can respect it if you would be annoyed in my place, no worries.
Never mind
Wildstar somehow remind of Borderlands lol
But, imo, most of the visible tatoos look really really bad, in a ghetto sort-of way. Here's a view from a country that's neither 1st world or America: We don't see tatoos all that often, which makes it rare and almost taboo, because it's "different". I think last time I saw a person with tatoos was probably like a year or so ago, and it was this skinhead diesel dude that you'd expect to find on a motorbike in Texas, not here. So, sheep mentality or not, I really don't like tatoos. It's your body, you do what you want with it, but if I was looking for employees, I'd like someone who didn't have one over someone who did have one (personal opinion, take it with a grain of salt).
Facial piercings are just gross for me. I don't even care if this offends anyone, if you have a ring in your brow/lip/nose, please don't approach me, because I have a very sensitive stomach and a gag reflex kicks in (not even trying to be rude, it's the truth).
He was probably referring to the fact that you had to point out the obvious like 3-4 times.
Can I ask how something as simple as a nose piercing (probably the most common) is in any way "nauseating"?
I dont quite understand how a tiny little gem would cause your stomach to be offended, sure if said person had a flesh tunnel in their nose, that is understandable, but a tiny little gem like Mercy and myself have is just confusing.
I don't think that's the kind of thing that can be explained... it's just his personal taste. Everyone has their own limits of what they find appealing. Some people would find the nose flesh tunnel normal or even hot, some consider that even one is one too many. I can't understand the appeal people have with creating dick holes in their ears (those "expansor" things), but you see them a dime a dozen.