Can't say I know how you came to that conclusion. Giving a donor's opinion more importance over a person who plays here but hasn't donated is biased and unfair. And if we did listen to donors exclusively, I can assure you that Lordaeron donors would not be the majority of any whole. I think it's best that we form a dialogue with the players as a whole and not just donors.
You have to be online on a specific time on a specific faction in order to do any PvP? Doesn't sound ideal to me.
I'd say you've misunderstood what was said here. The factor of luck he was speaking of, was to the effect of having enough people online and in the queue to get such a BG to pop. To the effect of his mention of longer queues, it wasn't an excuse of anything. In fact, his point is that some people may think lack of PvP competitiveness is equivalent to less people being around and queueing and thus causing longer queues, but then went on to specifically say that is NOT the only issue.
"pay to win crowd"
*cringe*
You aren't playing against Icecrown players exclusively though. It's not like the system is directly pitting only Lordaeron players against Icecrown players. That's not the case. YOU may be passionate about this point of view on the situation, but you must also recognize that you are not speaking for everyone.
So retail started its decline in Vanilla? Because that's when cross-realm battlegrounds and battlegroups were implemented.
That's your opinion. You are welcome to it, but the point I'm making here is that not everyone agrees.
That's really besides the point, isn't it? You're welcome to do as you wish, but I don't think threats or demands are pertinent to the discussion we should be having.
That would be ideal. But right now, on the negative spectrum, we're getting rigid and not very constructive feedback for the most part. What I'd prefer is a discussion about doing it in the best possible way that we can. It's a system that's still in development and there is plenty of space for improvement. So, please, engage us with more than "Wall of NO".

