When did I say I think you was insulted? You got a bit cocky with the 'Be sarcastic, keep my interested' part, in my eyes you was bigging yourself up, I had to knock you down a peg, take it how you want /shrug. This is, after all a discussion of why MBoxing should or should not be removed...rememebr that :)
If blizzard barely got paid anymore (I assume we are on about income from WoW, because I imagine the company get, a year, every single user of this forum's annual wage and then some) then they would more than likely of shutdown WoW. No point keeping something running if they get no income eh? And yes roughly every 2 years. That 'opinion' about anyone you know receiving more money than Blizz do off of Multiboxers through expacs just blew my mind, give me proof of the amount of multi-boxers that bought WoD and then we can do the Maths together and work it out:) Jk you can't ever possibly know how many multiboxers came into WoD. No, blizz did not say (go link me a blue post if you disagree) who the /follow change was targetted at, but threads such as
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/8087929775 and
http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/7341114868 kind of speak for themselves. You do not need to do anything to catch a /follow afker out, if they try to afk the whole bg they would eventually lose distance of their /follow target and stand idle or just be spotted and reported.
Why are you mentioning just World PvP? Multiboxing doesn't revolve around that one aspect...or is there some hidden 'declaration' in teh Multiboxing community saying that it's only for world PvP? I gave you an example of Blizz not giving a **** about Multiboxers. They are tolerated, that's it, due to the income they bring end of. Quote from a forum MvP and also a boxer 'I'm a multiboxer myself, but I just can't agree with the refunds.
Blizzard's policy has -always- been that multiboxing is tolerated but not supported.
There was never the expectation of support for it. Changes could happen at any point and boxers have to adapt.' Source:
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/8087929775
You don't need to be a genius to work out why they are tolerated but not supported.
Blizz-like...thanks for saying that... 'Blizz-like: alike to Blizzard.
"Alike
adjective
having resemblance or similarity; having or showing no marked or important difference"'
How "alike to Blizzard" and where it won't be "alike to Blizzard" is, in the last instance, up to the Administration and the Staff.
This thread is a case where it was decided to get the community's opinion and reasoning. Transmogrification won't be included, poll or no poll, for example.
All that is a word for word quote by a staff member.