Found some old Molten Warsong screenshots :(
https://i.imgur.com/hz9lAkB.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/T4Puzrl.jpg
When arenas were actually challenging, good opponents, and you had to play with the best to beat them....Now, none of those things matter. People posting 1.8k or 2k MMR screenshots on the forum......
p.s: nice binds I know :*
-
Member
That feeling...
-
Member
y nice times, when ret did triple the dmg it does now, when exorcism and mastery ignored all dmg reduction effects. when gurthalak proc was like a new ability for rets to use. mhmhm good times
-
Member
nice binds
-
Member
"When arenas were actually challenging" ??????????? WTF?? Are you kidding me? THE REAL CHALLENGE was in AT but ofcourse you didnt played there otherwise you would be posting some High MMR Arenas or you went there they kicked your arse and you went back to "Molten" because lets be honest now Molten is in the History now its Warmane and arenas in AT were BILION TIMES more balanced than it used to be in Molten back then and some might start sayin "but molten got 1k ppl and AT had 100" SO WHAT?????? Quality is much more valueble than some... with excuse.... "Clickers with no binds and macros pretending to be good because the bugs and pve gear are carrying them" and even now with the Merge with Molten which is now Warmane Warsong is still 90% like the old Warsong back there on Molten so stop complaining about "we want old warsong back" cuz you already have it. The big MMR Players want AT core for 1 Reason... Stable PVP because its a PVP Server not some sort of PVE... if we wanted PVE we would go on Nelth..... USE YOUR LOGIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! pce
P.S. Sry if i hurted someones feelings but this is the Truth and you gotta acept it!
-
Member
I second that, also he should've instead posted the aftermath defeat screenshots of these arenas so we can all be amused at the ridiculous low amount of time someone can lose an arena.
-
Member
Won both matches :*
AT Cata had 100 players....Molten had 2k+. Got bored of farming bads @ AT, so came back here....Got some of those screenshots to...
How easy you forget....Remember what happened last time you guys said AT was better? Raunchy, Mistr, and Corrupt made their 3s team on AT and ABSOLUTELY FARMED THE *************** out of you kids...Top team at the end of the season on your 3s Cata ladder.Funny how easy people forget thing not in their interest to reveal....
P.s to even que into those kind of players, MMR and rating back then was actually working and scaled correctly to 2.4k-2.6k....I don't see any of you kids posting screenshots like that? All I ever see on here are 1800 bads....
-
Member
ok... so you are telling me that a player(means you mate) shadow priest that has no binds or macros can defeat Mistr and Raunchy????????? how do you expect us to believe that since they won every 3s event or tourny or whatever there was on Molten back then tbh i never saw Raunchy Mistr on AT maybe they were offline when i was online or whatever also last 3v3 tournament i saw on AT Snipin was second and the winner team were Shatterplay so idk you tell me cuz i think you are lieing about that thing you were sayin and also i think you lie about that you beat em with those binds and macros i am almost 100% sure you didnt beat em or u might did if someone lagged or DC but anyways back then on Molten Caster comps were ruling the 3v3 since (you provoked me with the first sentence which is "Remember what happened last time you guys said AT was better? Raunchy, Mistr, and Corrupt made their 3s team on AT and ABSOLUTELY FARMED THE *************** out of you kids...Top team at the end of the season on your 3s Cata ladder.Funny how easy people forget thing not in their interest to reveal...." ok.. its more than 1 sentence but w/e) PVE can carry you more than now cuz back then only ppl with money can get HC gurth Rathrak or any other PVE thing.... and the funny part is that they think they are actually good... ROFL...... listen close to this one and stick this into your HEAD! AT = Quality, Skill..... Molten = Players, thats all molten have, compared to AT Molten had only the players, AT got the skill quality and yet got some players but those players weren't a lot but anyways..... you need to learn how to play in a server without Bugs like AT was :) THEN you can talk about who is better and who is not and prob compare Molten to AT, and i know that you gonna say " i have played there and i rekt them so i went back to molten to have some fun" do you really think we gonna balieve this crap if you say it????? if you want a compare right now you better check the ladders now so you can see who is top 1 now on 2s and 3s and nope its not me but those that are top 1 now are AT players and the last season it was the same and the season before that so dont tell US that Molten > AT ..... in my oponion... i am for AT cuz i love it more and since they have a perfect CATACLYSM PVP Core... (take this personal to you Bosnian1) You can put your Molten Core up your arse and have a nice day!
-
Member
Raunchy Corrupt ARE BEST PLAYERS thats why corrupt paid to get titles ;^)))))))))))
-
Member
too long, didn't read
