We're discussing semantics here but ok. First, I don't even know who the hell that guy is. If he's important, he's a nobody to me. Never heard of him, don't really care about who he is. I hold no emotion on my criticism, reason why I've stated: It's his opinion, nothing else. In the same way that you will say the same thing thowards my opinion.
I'm applying a logic behind my posts (that can be converted to a fact if you do your research before replying) and you're sitting here answering to my posts with two insults in a row. So who's the person that is applying emotions?
Icecrown suffered the multiple scripting changes and we all saw Icecrown Citadel and Ruby Sanctum being undoable for a few weeks. Hell, if not even months. We all saw the ammount of exploits that popped. We all saw how many older fixes were broken again. We all saw how many mechanics were broken with the "new core" and we all know how many scripts were implemented on Icecrown in order to make sure that once they landed on Lordaeron they were working as intended. That's a road that can't be considered a win-win situation considering that you've made your community from Icecrown unable to enjoy the content as intended.
The core that was implemented, originally, broke more things than the ones that were actually fixed. The same core that was on Lordaeron, keep that in mind. Keeping in consideration that Icecrown has all the content available and that Lordaeron is having it's content released in a steady pace, what's the doubt? The content released on Icecrown was in a poor state, poorly tested and delivered in a really bad shape. Now, obviously, it's getting fixed here and there, but that doesn't change the fact that it was a poor change on the start of it. You shouldn't release, to a live server, content that isn't properly tested and if you do, you're making that realm a testing dummy. Did I make it clear now?
The state that things are now, they're decent. Icecrown almost fully recovered from a bumpy ride but that doesn't change the fact that I don't agree with the way that the whole change was done and with me many others. There were multiple threads about this. I was the author of
one of them. Let's not turn your biased reality into a fact now, shall we?