No I got the point of what you meant, but you forget that certain countries have certain customs and traditions, that what you said could have two meanings here.
As you can see from Slexia's response, she took it exactly the same was as I did.... Not your "How much of your boobs is tattooed" way.
I never understand why people get so weird voer tattoos. Neither of my past employers have cared that I have something on my hand. But one employer I knew forced a friend to wear bandages up their arms because of their tattoos.
Because it looks unprofessional as hell for the business to have someone with a tattoo on their hand. If they're given a choice between someone with a tattoo on their hand and without a tattoo, 99% of the time they'll pick someone without a tattoo unless you work at like a kmart on the bad side of town and all of the employees look like they are about to mug you
No I got the point of what you meant, but you forget that certain countries have certain customs and traditions, that what you said could have two meanings here.
As you can see from Slexia's response, she took it exactly the same was as I did.... Not your "How much of your boobs is tattooed" way.
if he wants to know that, then he asked the wrong question! You get stupid answers when you ask stupid questions ;D
Because it looks unprofessional as hell for the business to have someone with a tattoo on their hand. If they're given a choice between someone with a tattoo on their hand and without a tattoo, 99% of the time they'll pick someone without a tattoo unless you work at like a kmart on the bad side of town and all of the employees look like they are about to mug you
Maybe where you live that's how they view it, but here in the UK we're not stupid enough to judge someone's ability to do a job by what body art they have.
I have a really good job, I don't work on a checkout or in a shop. They value my experience and skill set higher than my sense in tattoos. Most of my tattoos are my own art work and have special meanings to me. If someone doesn't like my tattoos I don't really give a ****.
I didn't get them for anyone else.
Work wise, I've never had an issue, here in the UK.
Because it looks unprofessional as hell for the business to have someone with a tattoo on their hand. If they're given a choice between someone with a tattoo on their hand and without a tattoo, 99% of the time they'll pick someone without a tattoo unless you work at like a kmart on the bad side of town and all of the employees look like they are about to mug you
And sadly that is a stereotyping issue with society nowadays, which is discrimination here at least in the UK. I've seen surgeons with full body tattoos, school teachers with sleeves. Our military also lifted its ban on tattoos regarding visible parts while in uniform (hands and neck).
You cannot judge a person based on purely what they look like.
#MURICA, am I rite? Freedom only when the big boss man and the most conservative of society agrees.
And sadly that is a stereotyping issue with society nowadays, which is discrimination here at least in the UK. I've seen surgeons with full body tattoos, school teachers with sleeves. Our military also lifted its ban on tattoos regarding visible parts while in uniform (hands and neck).
You cannot judge a person based on purely what they look like.
#MURICA, am I rite? Freedom only when the big boss man and the most conservative of society agrees.
Pervy Ob. Hehe.
You're comparing highly skilled individuals that have not only graduated college, but proven themselves in the job field and are not easily replaceable compared to you who last I checked was working in the entry level stuff where eight million people apply. Employers want the best individual to represent their business, it's not rocket appliances. Someone with a ****ty tattoo on their hand looks far worse than someone without tattoos. Entry level people are replaceable and most of them handle customers, a surgeon or teacher isn't replaceable and have demonstrated the skills they need. Entry level needs no skills and can be replaced in a second.
You're comparing highly skilled individuals that have not only graduated college, but proven themselves in the job field and are not easily replaceable compared to you who last I checked was working in the entry level stuff where eight million people apply. Employers want the best individual to represent their business, it's not rocket appliances. Someone with a ****ty tattoo on their hand looks far worse than someone without tattoos. Entry level people are replaceable and most of them handle customers, a surgeon or teacher isn't replaceable and have demonstrated the skills they need. Entry level needs no skills and can be replaced in a second.
And yet nearly half of "entry level" employees here have visible tattoos and or facial piercings. Society here is very liberal, and we have freedom of expression no matter the workplace, regardless of profession.
Maybe in the next half a century some of the more developed countries will follow suit and remove such form of discrimination too.
And yet nearly half of "entry level" employees here have visible tattoos and or facial piercings. Society here is very liberal, and we have freedom of expression no matter the workplace, regardless of profession.
Maybe in the next half a century some of the more developed countries will follow suit and remove such form of discrimination too.
+10
True true, I agree with Kemii - in the UK you can go into most shops and see people working there with tattoos and piercings as Kemii said.
It's normal over here to accept everyone, no matter what they look like.
#MURICA, am I rite? Freedom only when the big boss man and the most conservative of society agrees.
I have to ask. What does that have to do with the discussion? Why do people feel it's necessary to insult the country for whatever random reason? In any case, I wish it'd stop. I find it offensive.