WotLK Needing for enchanting

[Mitzen]

One that would consider as ninja looting, but if u disenchant that means u steal from enchanter. Enchanter disenchant item that is clearly worse, that's his profession.
"You say there are no rules that states "you can't roll need for DE", did you forget there's no rule stating that you could?" -- So it making it rule-less, what means I can do it.
I won't write more, cuz it's impossible to make your guys head open. But after all I want to say need means need, thank you.

You won't write more, cuz you know you've ****ed up.
The rules may not say that you can't need roll for DE, but the way they are written, they still basically cover needing for DE without stating it so.

If I win with greed, I'm not stealing from enchanter. Now does it matter if I win with greed or DE, you still didn't get anything. Enchanters used to be "I can DE that for you" in dungeons, act of kindness, something you seem to be unfamiliar with. That changed with introduction of RDF, where DE roll was given for all if enchanter was in the party so players don't have to do this back and forth trading when disenchanting, and now some entitled enchanters think items/DE belongs to them alone.
Self entitlement seems to be rather strong.

I have several enchanters, never had an issue with others pressing that DE button.

[Flinston]

You won't write more, cuz you know you've ****ed up.
The rules may not say that you can't need roll for DE, but the way they are written, they still basically cover needing for DE without stating it so.

If I win with greed, I'm not stealing from enchanter. Now does it matter if I win with greed or DE, you still didn't get anything. Enchanters used to be "I can DE that for you" in dungeons, act of kindness, something you seem to be unfamiliar with. That changed with introduction of RDF, where DE roll was given for all if enchanter was in the party so players don't have to do this back and forth trading when disenchanting, and now some entitled enchanters think items/DE belongs to them alone.
Self entitlement seems to be rather strong.

I have several enchanters, never had an issue with others pressing that DE button.

I can't write anymore becouse It won't change anything. Most of the people not enchanting, then it still will be as ninja looting. Won't lose my vitality for stupid discuss. I made my sweat, answered even future answers that still appear. I feel bad for my head if I would go further for loose-loose thing.

[angrylol]

That's right, having or not having enchanting has no relevance.
Press NEED to equip upgrade. Press GREED for everything else.

[Morvion]

dude wants to earn mining/herbalism gold with enchanting. bother himself with mental gymnastic to make sense his own term against the rules.
dude really need to try engineering.

[Flinston]

dude wants to earn mining/herbalism gold with enchanting. bother himself with mental gymnastic to make sense his own term against the rules.
dude really need to try engineering.

Jesus I have to gymnastic my mental even more. If mining/herbalism can earing gold with disenchant, so why not earning mining/herbaslim being a enchanter? lmao

[Flinston]

That's right, having or not having enchanting has no relevance.
Press NEED to equip upgrade. Press GREED for everything else.

Need doesn't mean "equip upgrade". Need means "require (something) because it is essential or very important rather than just desirable" (even google knows better the meaning of this word)

[Flinston]

I'm afraid this debate won't never stop...

[Morvion]

Jesus I have to gymnastic my mental even more. If mining/herbalism can earing gold with disenchant, so why not earning mining/herbaslim being a enchanter? lmao

any normal person would know thats not even what i said

[Flinston]

Would be funny if someone specially wear worse gear to grind items at dungeon

[Flinston]

any normal person would know thats not even what i said

U said "dude wants to earn mining/herbalism gold with enchanting:" I answered "so why not earning mining/herbaslim being a enchanter?"

[Flinston]

We could make petition, becouse there is no rule that says "You are not able to press "need" at Random Dungeon as an enchater, becouse of 100% chance to disenchant"
So becouse of smaller quantity of enchanters on server, We could make a petition that creates new rule that says -- "As an enchanter u are able to press "need" at Random Dungeon (UNLESS SOMEONE NEEDS IT FOR GEAR UP!!!)" The decision is made up to boost the economy of the server, making an enchanters not being dependent of non-enchanting professions durning RDF. Sound smart enough I think
I would love to see results :))

[Flinston]

nvm i changed my mind. you are a hundred and ten percent right. everyone else is wrong. keep pressing need.

Why u think I'm pressing need? I can't press need becouse I would get banned becouse of non-existing rule LOL

[Flinston]

Even blizzard developers had mental problem bout this disenchant button, so they deleted it XD
https://eu.forums.blizzard.com/en/wo...n-wotlk/354980
People was begging for not to deleting it, becouse of not possibility of getting 2,5 profession. Economy raised and more people was involved in enchanting. So banning a person for "rules" that doesn't exist makes a person a caveman in my opinion. So I'm waiting for my ban :D
Greetings from the mauntain

[Shred]

I agree, the Disenchant button should not exist for the reason outlined in that post: "people were able to use other people’s profession without permission"

The Disenchant button cheapens Enchanting mats and Enchanting as a whole.

[Flinston]

I agree, the Disenchant button should not exist for the reason outlined in that post: "people were able to use other people’s profession without permission"

The Disenchant button cheapens Enchanting mats and Enchanting as a whole.

Finally, it took almost 50 posts to find someone have clue about economy