So you accuse me of writing "bibbles" (sic) while writing even longer posts, almost all of which is off-topic and a diversionary tactic to avoid the argument.
I tried to keep my previous post pretty simple. I basically had 2 points: 1) you need to provide examples of effective 70 arms warriors (you still haven't) 2) that your whining about faction imbalance is both false and based on your narrow experience.
You haven't rebutted either point, you've just hurled many random accusations and attacks at me.
Let me respond to some of those first:
- I don't backpedal. I have my "s" key bound to shadowflame. You are just making sh*t up. And how is this relevant anyway?
- I ate interrupts/spell reflects? Did it matter? In those games where we're farming you I'm more or less checked out and chatting away in gchat/bg chat and/or doing other things. Not like you were posing a particular challenge that needed my full attention (you barely left a scratch). And how is this relevant anyway?
- I don't have 7% hit rating. I still miss sometimes. And again how is this relevant anyway?
- My talents. My talents are for me. There are no "correct" talents. These are talents that I prefer and I'm not recommending them to anyone. And how is this relevant anyway?
- My minions. I prefer voidwalker because of the teams that I face. If the teams I faced were stacked with mages/shamans I would consider felhunter. But they just never are. Succubus? That ***** is dead in 2 ticks of starfall and is useless in battlegrounds (it's not a duel). But how is this relevant anyway?
- I already said I don't premade, so how am I in control of this "nasty set up" (more QQ from you) And how is this relevant anyway?
Now I'll move on to responding to some points that are (at least somewhat) on topic:
-You keep repeating this theorycrafting about arpen. I have already responded to this: I want examples of effective 70 arms warriors that are outperforming 79s. If your theorycrafting is correct, this should be easy. So do it and stop repeating the same stuff (but with added insults about walnut brains)
- Your screenshot is not a "balanced" battleground. I count 8 twinks for ally and 4 for horde (plus1 decent leveller, niceaxe). If you consider that balanced, then that says a lot about the games you're looking for.
- I have a "reign of terror" with "henchmen"? Care to explain what you mean in less histrionic language? Again, I don't premade like I already said, so wtf are you talking about? You got stomped hard a few times by teams with me in it (where you tunnelled me instead of the healers) and now bear a grudge like I'm somehow responsible for your bad experience. Get over it.
- It doesn't matter if you spent 5 years on this bracket if your Paladin has less than 10k kills and your Warrior less than 2k kills. This means you're extremely inactive and unaware of what battlegrounds are like in this bracket on a day-to-day basis. Therefore you shouldn't be commenting on it and telling new people to stay away and it's not worth playing. You don't have the experience to be able to draw this conclusion.
- My point in the 58 pages thread about "faction imbalance" was to make the same point I'm making to you. The claim that alliance had fewer twinks was (and remains) false. Back then we had a website that tracked the number of twinks, and to many people's surprise and chagrin it demonstrated objectively that, contrary to many alliance players' perceptions, alliance actually had more twinks (I can't recall the exact ratio). I wasn't qqing about imbalance. I was dispelling misconceptions. Which is the same thing I'm doing with you. I played on another server that actually did have big imbalance problems, and trust me warmane has never reached anything close to that (though of course there are swings back and forth, as is natural).
So again, my two points remain. You haven't demonstrated (with even one example) that 70 warriors are performing more effectively in the bracket than 79s (because they aren't). Faction imbalance (while of course never perfect) is not a *real* problem. Both sides have twinks. Both sides win games. There are gonna be stomps by both sides against each other sometimes, complete with gy camping of course (both sides do it). There are also many even, fun games in between. I am level headed enough not to draw large conclusions, talking about a broken bracket based on a spell of a few bad games.
But you don't seem capable of responding to any person or situation in anything other than a histrionic, over-the-top way.