Simplicity would not help when describing a complicated and/or difficult boss fight.
'); document.write(''); var yuipath = 'clientscript/yui'; var yuicombopath = ''; var remoteyui = false; } else // Load Rest of YUI remotely (where possible) { var yuipath = 'https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/yui/2.9.0/build'; var yuicombopath = ''; var remoteyui = true; if (!yuicombopath) { document.write(''); } } var SESSIONURL = "s=8d8f8b1835135293a978541a51f4bff9&"; var SECURITYTOKEN = "guest"; var IMGDIR_MISC = "warmane/misc"; var IMGDIR_BUTTON = "warmane/buttons"; var vb_disable_ajax = parseInt("0", 10); var SIMPLEVERSION = "422"; var BBURL = "https://forum.warmane.com"; var LOGGEDIN = 0 > 0 ? true : false; var THIS_SCRIPT = "showthread"; var RELPATH = "showthread.php?p=2150210"; var PATHS = { forum : "", cms : "", blog : "" }; var AJAXBASEURL = "https://forum.warmane.com/"; var CoTTooltips = { rename: true, icons: false, iconsize: 15, qualitycolor: true, overridecolor: { spells: '#839309', items: '', npcs: '#fff', objects: '#fff', quests: '#ffb100', achievements: '#fff' } }; // -->
Meh...It's Hagara... o well..
Ah. Hagara's not super complicated.
I don't think it would be a problem unless your video was hard to understand.
haha....add 1 more... ;)
Life is never simple. Unless you're a Barbie girl.
well at least you didnt spend yesterday walking around stores setting off every alarm because the ***** sales person forgot to take the security tag off my coat, which I was wearing...
So all day I spent the day wearing a giant plastic tag on my coat, and setting of any theft alarms..
![]()
Spent a good minute wondering why she took a picture of her nipple.
Woooooops.
Spoiler:Show
So why didn't you go back and have the remove the security tag?
I'm going to assume she didn't realize until the end of the day.
That ^^
I didnt notice till I got all the way home, luckily I have to go back town tomorrow anyway so i can get it done then :)
I cannot completely express how ambivalent I am about staying true to the contents of a book when producing the movie adaptation. More often than not, little details, the specific sequence of events or major plot points, put a book's characters and their actions in perspective. It makes much less sense for a protagonist to have feelings of inadequacy after single-handedly saving the world than it does for him (not sexist, but I am not about to put him/her a thousand times) to feel jubilant and lighthearted--why push that unnatural angst on him? Or even worse, the littlest detail--admittedly, the one I have in mind did save a character, but it wasn't a particularly important plot point until death became imminent--becomes the central quest's focus. Honestly. Do you need to flip the book over, empty its guts, then stab, slice, and hack until you get a new, heavily butchered version?
On the other hand, sometimes the novelty of a movie adaptation keeps it fresh. It all depends on what movies represent to you--are they merely manifestations of the book in a visual format, or opportunities to explore what could've happened? Should they be book-to-movie productions with no liberties taken? I can't say for certain. I like it when there are differences, but not huge ones. Rarely does a movie mix it up a lot in such a way that the movie benefits in some marked way, but it does happen. Rarely being the key word.
Who am I kidding? I just wished movies were as good as their books. I think I'd tolerate the insertion of an undead unicorn with alcoholic and abusive tendencies if it made the Percy Jackson movies less ****. Two of what I assume to be five movies have been of the vomit-inducing variety. Bleh. At least Divergent is supposedly good. Time to watch Arizona finish its royal *** whooping of Gonzaga.
If you'r Horde you are probably losing