1. Umm, I usually don't get involved but now you're literally provoking the guy and baiting him to respond so you can ban him.
    Nah you just weren't around when he went about offending and mocking anyone who disagreed with his "hard-facts," because he was extremely well-informed and in close contact with the brightest minds of the world, making him the top person in knowledge of neuroscience, with deep insights on the workings of the brain way beyond any other human being. The fact he could never link or quote any of those studies, much less show any of his own world-renowned articles that were made public in all magazines on medical science, was just him wanting to remain incognito, of course.

    Talking out of your *** just doesn't pays well these days, it seems.

  2. Nah you just weren't around when he went about offending and mocking anyone who disagreed with his "hard-facts," because he was extremely well-informed and in close contact with the brightest minds of the world, making him the top person in knowledge of neuroscience, with deep insights on the workings of the brain way beyond any other human being. The fact he could never link or quote any of those studies, much less show any of his own world-renowned articles that were made public in all magazines on medical science, was just him wanting to remain incognito, of course.

    Talking out of your *** just doesn't pays well these days, it seems.
    I remember that day, we double teamed him, was pretty funny.
    /higfive


  3. It's a list of people who need to get a life, ranked in order.

    Clearly Lawl needs to get out more.

  4. I remember that day, we double teamed him, was pretty funny.
    /higfive
    I'm not much of a highfive person, but groping would be off-limits.
    Let's stick to an up-nod.

  5. Im 3rd... Soon to be 2nd.
    I miss being #1 non-staff poster on forum. I worked hard for that.
    You can have #1. I have an unfair advantage.
    I'm not much of a highfive person, but groping would be off-limits.
    Let's stick to an up-nod.
    Depends on who it is.

  6. Depends on who it is.
    Groping you in this context would be a bit odd.
    But if it works as an excuse for you, fine by me.

  7. Groping you in this context would be a bit odd.
    But if it works as an excuse for you, fine by me.
    What sort of context would that be? And I know it'd be fine by you. I'm sure you'd get a fair bit of enjoyment out of it.

  8. What sort of context would that be? And I know it'd be fine by you. I'm sure you'd get a fair bit of enjoyment out of it.
    The context of doing it as replacement for a high-five with Kemii? Her hand held up while I get some handfuls in a different direction? Not necessarily bad, but odd describes it to some extent.


  9. The context of doing it as replacement for a high-five with Kemii? Her hand held up while I get some handfuls in a different direction? Not necessarily bad, but odd describes it to some extent.
    I guess. But that's on you, really. I mean, it's what you preferred. If it were me, I'd probably slap you. Though you'd probably like that too.

  10. I guess. But that's on you, really. I mean, it's what you preferred.
    Who says I'd prefer to limit myself?

    If it were me, I'd probably slap you. Though you'd probably like that too.
    Like you probably would like to get one back, based on where it landed.

    Well. I now feel awkward..
    What happened to you being "ununconfortableable"? I wasn't even trying.

  11. Like you probably would like to get one back, based on where it landed.
    ha

    ha

    ...
    Um.

  12. I wake up, make some coffee, sit outside, watch the birds do bird things an i read this? Too early.

  13. If smoke a lot of weed now. Like 5g per day

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •