How is multiboxing not balanced? Any is able to do it, nothing is stopping you. It is like when a maxed level ganks low levels, I don't like it, theres nothing I can do to stop it, it's just part of the game and you have to deal with it. When your maxed level, you have the ability to do the same.
You find the 90% of the players base here being naive to follow the game mechanic and not trying to have an army as the wow END game? Every multiplayer videogame need balancing tests. You think Blizzard did multibox balancing tests? You think multibox is possible to balance with an incalculable amount of classes combinations?
You think that Blizzard was building a RTS when they was developing an MMORPG?
You find ineresting and balanced a server where averyone have a army of 40 characters? Why don't you ask for a dedicated multibox server?
You find the 90% of the players base here being naive to follow the game mechanic and not trying to have an army as the wow END game? Every multiplayer videogame need balancing tests. You think Blizzard did multibox balancing tests? You think multibox is possible to balance with an incalculable amount of classes combinations?
You think that Blizzard was building a RTS when they was developing an MMORPG?
You find ineresting and balanced a server where averyone have a army of 40 characters? Why don't you ask for a dedicated multibox server?
It's not suppose to be balanced. Low level PVP isnt balanced, and blizzard doesn't balance it. Does that mean it should be removed? How do you even balance multiboxxing? Your argument doesn't make sense imo.
Low level as well of max level aren't completely balanced because Blizzard just forgot the pvp part of his videogame. This is why MOP and WOD are 2 big fail.
Low level as well of max level aren't completely balanced because Blizzard just forgot the pvp part of his videogame. This is why MOP and WOD are 2 big fail.
You're denying your previous statement now. Is it worth to continue to discuss with you? I think not.
No, blizzard attempts to balance PVP at max level but they have stated before they don't care about non-max level balance. Shouldn't it then be removed from the game? Also, where did I contradict myself? If I did, my apologies.
You find the 90% of the players base here being naive to follow the game mechanic and not trying to have an army as the wow END game? Every multiplayer videogame need balancing tests. You think Blizzard did multibox balancing tests? You think multibox is possible to balance with an incalculable amount of classes combinations?
You think that Blizzard was building a RTS when they was developing an MMORPG?
You find ineresting and balanced a server where averyone have a army of 40 characters? Why don't you ask for a dedicated multibox server?
A 40 man premade can easily beat a 40 man boxer. So yeah, even in world pvp multiboxing is absolutely balanced.
Lets talk about the other aspects of WoW where balance is much more important than in World PvP:
- In arena a multiboxer was never able to get a gladiator titel (not even in the 5s bracket). So its rather a disadvantage to multibox in arena.
- When it comes to raiding the best pve multiboxer cant even reach the achievements of a average ICC pug raid.
- When it comes to Battlegrounds a Multiboxer really need to give everything to be as effective as the same amount of normal players.
Edit: Have to correct myself. Aelli reached gladiator titel in 5s during TBC with his 4 ele Shamis. It was the only multiboxer ever. Anyway, its not really worth to mention that because Warmane doesnt has a TBC realm and 5s is dead.
You find the 90% of the players base here being naive to follow the game mechanic and not trying to have an army as the wow END game? Every multiplayer videogame need balancing tests. You think Blizzard did multibox balancing tests? You think multibox is possible to balance with an incalculable amount of classes combinations?
You think that Blizzard was building a RTS when they was developing an MMORPG?
You find ineresting and balanced a server where averyone have a army of 40 characters? Why don't you ask for a dedicated multibox server?
exaggerate much? everyone with a 40 toon army? who would do that? i have yet to find a 40 player multibox. What do RTS have to do with WoW ur mixing stuf bud. I wouldnt mind if they limit multibox to 5 toons but asking for a multibox server? lol if mbox was popular enough there would been multibox servers already. Quit whining and learn how to counter a multiboxer or go multibox urself, ull find that its not that easy.
This one remind me the Rogue in Neltharion those days lol: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uytPKO_-6k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A 40 man premade can easily beat a 40 man boxer. So yeah, even in world pvp multiboxing is absolutely balanced.
Lets talk about the other aspects of WoW where balance is much more important than in World PvP:
- In arena a multiboxer was never able to get a gladiator titel (not even in the 5s bracket). So its rather a disadvantage to multibox in arena.
- When it comes to raiding the best pve multiboxer cant even reach the achievements of a average ICC pug raid.
- When it comes to Battlegrounds a Multiboxer really need to give everything to be as effective as the same amount of normal players.
Edit: Have to correct myself. Aelli reached gladiator titel in 5s during TBC with his 4 ele Shamis. It was the only multiboxer ever. Anyway, its not really worth to mention that because Warmane doesnt has a TBC realm and 5s is dead.
You most really learn the meaning of the word "Balanced" my friend. Next time we play chess I will use 40 kings, 40 queens, etc :D
It's ok for you? :DD
exaggerate much? everyone with a 40 toon army? who would do that? i have yet to find a 40 player multibox. What do RTS have to do with WoW ur mixing stuf bud. I wouldnt mind if they limit multibox to 5 toons but asking for a multibox server? lol if mbox was popular enough there would been multibox servers already. Quit whining and learn how to counter a multiboxer or go multibox urself, ull find that its not that easy.
I like to play wow and other RPGs with 1 character. Is that so strange? :O
You most really learn the meaning of the word Balanced my friend. Next time we play chess I will use 40 kings, 40 queens, etc :D
It's ok for you? :DD
U cant bring 40 characters to Arena nor to a raid.
When u multibox in a bg with 40 chars (good luck to get them all in the same BG) then u will also face 40 enemys.
In every aspect of the game (beside world PvP) u will always face the same amount of opponents and thats a fact that u completely seem to blind out.
U cant bring 40 characters to Arena nor to a raid.
When u multibox in a bg with 40 chars (good luck to get them all in the same BG) then u will also face 40 enemys.
In every aspect of the game (beside world PvP) u will always face the same amount of opponents and thats a fact that u completely seem to blind out.
You are taking me to the letter to lie at the community once again. 10/20/30/40 the imbalance issue doesn't change.
You also clutch at straws, once again to lie to the community once again, talking about 40 char in arena on purpose. The community isn't so naive. I'm really tired of you and your tricks.
Than we are mostly talking about open world pvp here.
You are taking me to the letter to lie at the community once again. 10/20/30/40 the imbalance issue doesn't change.
Than we are mostly talking about open world pvp here.
We? Right now its mainly just u who is talking about World PvP because u obviously want to avoid the other aspects of WoW where balance plays a so much more important role.
Well, okay. Lets talk about world pvp:
World pvp was never balanced by blizzard because of the simple fact that there is not a set limit of ppl that can participate on each side in a world PvP scenario.
World pvp can be 1v1, it can be 3v1, i can be 10v5, it can be 40v15, it can be whatever u can imagine.
Is it a balanced battle when 3 ppl decide to kill a single player? No
Is it a balanced battle when a multiboxer decides to kill a single player? No
Is it a balanced battle when a 40 man premade decides to attack a city? No
Is it a balanced battle when a 40 man multiboxer decides to attack a city? No
As u can see its absolutely pointless to talk about balance in world PvP.