Am i a noob or what is this **** ?

[zzadr]

Well yea they (blizzard) basically removed what made this class fun to play as they did for most classes. Funny thing when you think hunter was the most powerful class in cata. For me the worst bug in hunters is the bugged pets commands. Their dmg is still OP but thats true for most classes.

[Synx7]

What can I say? Im salty I lost a 1v1 against a clicking backpedaling hunter purely down to no minimum range (I was literally on top of him run running circles around him).

That 8 yard minimum range was the sole counterplay along with a disarm. In cata all disarms were in melee range except one of Spriest's Fear.

[Suffler]

Bias much? You're playing the most braindead class in the game, with the addition of MoP.
No minim range, tons of stuns/roots disengages, faceroll. Seriously , "they should deal more dmg". Love that Binding shot in tandem with Narrow escape. 8 sec unbreakable root + that 3 sec guaranteed stun. No wonder everyone called them "Melee hunters" Whats the point playing a caster or melee when you have a melee hunter. No minim range anymore because pathetic huntards couldn't keep a distance of 8 yards in PvE, thats why it got removed. lol
Sick of these replies. " My class should be more OP than it is , deal with it "

hunters are op bro?

i'm 90% griv and got hit 400k by a destro lock without any major buffs like berserk or flag buff etc
also...lets not bring up the warriors / rogues that basically rape u in 1 rotation in under 5 seconds if you have no idea what you're doing

i really dont understand why you ppl qq about hunters, i play 1 and im decent at it (by decent i mean constantly toping charts and arenas) and i can easily tell you that there are classes way more op than hunter + hunter is squishy as **** if your opponent knows his class

in the end, why start a flame topic that has no solution, the problem is NOT warmane, the problem is blizzard and their awful scaling (griv is like 100k more hp than tyrannical and the damage is directly proportional). i also had this issue when i was undergeared due to previous expansions not being so unballanced (wotlk and even cata, where u stood a chance in a lower tier set vs a max tier set)

Love that Binding shot in tandem with Narrow escape. 8 sec unbreakable root + that 3 sec guaranteed stun.

^ this is all i need to know regarding why you consider hunters OP, my suggestion would be "learn what other classes do and how their skills react" only THEN make a QQ thread about someone being OP

[Synx7]

hunters are op bro?

i'm 90% griv and got hit 400k by a destro lock without any major buffs like berserk or flag buff etc
also...lets not bring up the warriors / rogues that basically rape u in 1 rotation in under 5 seconds if you have no idea what you're doing

i really dont understand why you ppl qq about hunters, i play 1 and im decent at it (by decent i mean constantly toping charts and arenas) and i can easily tell you that there are classes way more op than hunter + hunter is squishy as **** if you know your class

in the end, why start a flame topic that has no solution, the problem is NOT warmane, the problem is blizzard and their awful scaling (griv is like 100k more hp than tyrannical and the damage is directly proportional). i also had this issue when i was undergeared due to previous expansions not being so unballanced (wotlk and even cata, where u stood a chance in a lower tier set vs a max tier set)

Ofc a hunter has to defend his class.
Don't do it desperately , as warmane doesn't buff or nerf classes. They fix the bugs they have.
Gimme that ss of 400k. My highest chaos bolt with one of my locks was 210k, with buffstacking. And the highest Shodowburn ive seen on my Warrior was 390k.
Don't even get me started on Wild Quiver bug that double procs , off everything. I almost got 2 shooted by hunter in arena yesterday. Chimera, Glaive toss = 28% health. gg

[Suffler]

let me repeat this

Love that Binding shot in tandem with Narrow escape. 8 sec unbreakable root + that 3 sec guaranteed stun.

^ this is all i need to know regarding why you consider hunters OP, my suggestion would be "learn what other classes do and how their skills react" only THEN make a QQ thread about someone being OP

[Synx7]

let me repeat this



^ this is all i need to know regarding why you consider hunters OP, my suggestion would be "learn what other classes do and how their skills react" only THEN make a QQ thread about someone being OP

Learn huh? Boy i've quitted retail as soon as the ****ty WoD got released. I've been a 2.2k rating as Boomkin + resto sham. Just to solve your concerns about my knowledge about this ****ty xpac. I still miss cata , pre DS gear. Imo the most balanced PvP in wows' history. Even when the DS gear got released. Facing a pally in arena with gurthalak , proccing 2-3 tentacles wouldn't burst me down as fast as a warrior or hunter does in MoP.
it's op because melee classes struggle/can't really reach a hunter , they removed their minim range, and the class feels broken , easy, braindead , feels like playing Rdps and Mdps at the same time.
Them, and warriors. These 2 classes lost any skill required in order to reach r1 , and its pretty infuriating how some classes can't even scratch a hunter. Especially enha sham.
P.s I'm so bored playing my warrior that i want to play a dk or monk. But considering how broken warriors are and braindead as well, i'm sticking with them.. even tho i don't like them one bit. The only thing i like about them is the ******ed mobility

[Suffler]

and a 2.2k boomkin + resto sham doesnt know the fact that aside from the binding shot and intimidation stuns, the rest of the ccs are canceled on hit? (kinda ruins your 11 second cc there honey) this kinda gives me the feel you didn't even reach 1k, or if you ever did reach 2k it was either on a pve server OR getting carried

let me enlighten you about the "struggles" of the melee classes vs hunter:
- wars have arguably the most offensive mobility ingame as a melee, and if they time their bladestorm right they faceroll you before you get the chance to activate deterrance
- rogues have a skill called "burst of speed" that pretty much allows them to break any root and sprint their way up to the enemy's a$$ 100% of the time , AND their slow poison is more of a pain in the *** than any other slow provited by the hunter
- paladin well, i only played one for 5-6 years but i think freedom + offensive bubble wings does miracles
- monks they have a ton of mobility, we all know that + cleanses
- DK <<<<<<< THIS is the only guy who would have some problems with mobility vs a hunter...and even so hes a pain in the *** with it comes to slows (slow + grip + stun + slow does miracles in the right hands)
- enha sham you're just terrible if you can't "scratch" a hunter with this guy

i'm not gonna say hunter is not a counter for some classes...but id rather consider it a counter for ranged classes more than melee classes, mainly couse melee classes run around you and make it annoyingly hard to HIT them ( YOU HAVE TO FACE YOUR TARGET IN ORDER TO ATTACK IT), while a ranged target is far easier to target hit and cc

anyway, youre already set on the ideea that "that mean guy playing a huntir iz OP" can i suggest some videos explaining every class to you? maybe then you learn stuff and stop qqing like a girl

[Sokadikelem00]

Firstly i didn't want to start a flame topic, it was meant for gaining information for myself and other half *****s like i am so i can be prepared for next times. Secondly i do know that there are other classes that are op - er (is this right o.O ?) than the hunter but i often see that a hunter wins a bg for the faction. Call me a girl, ***** or noob i don't care, bunch of them could be right but i had to make this topic or else i could have gone insane already (if i haven't yet =P).

[Torcida1950]

Well, I wouldn't say they are OP as much as some other classes, but it's one of the most annoying classes in the game, and definitely easiest one to play. Literally no skill required...

[MeneerPrins]

There are only 3 hunters in top 100 with 2s... pffff "OP"

@Suffler Burst of speed doesn't break roots, only slows and it doesn't work on ice trap.

[Suffler]

its not about how hard the class is, its about how you play your class....every class is easy to a point, beyond that point you have to sing the piano in order to win vs people that actually have skill or a certain advantage over your class

@MeneerPrins yeh i was referring to that, for me root = slow xD, personal defect

[Torcida1950]

its not about how hard the class is, its about how you play your class....every class is easy to a point, beyond that point you have to sing the piano in order to win vs people that actually have skill or a certain advantage over your class

@MeneerPrins yeh i was referring to that, for me root = slow xD, personal defect

I agree that u have to master every class, but still, some classes are way easier to master than others, and Hunters are the easiest one of them all. You don't have to be very skilled to top the charts. I tried them all, and I know what I'm talking about. Ofc, there are ppl who mastered it completely and play better than others, but generally speaking, it's a noob class.

[-Notorious-]

Going to just point out Synx's experience in terms of PvP.

Here is Synx telling everyone how op Prot Warrior is in LK... with a shadowmourne

Just seen crap on youtube when one prot warror in BiS gear with mourne in hand , 2 shoot every player in arenas.
I could never reach more than lvl 21 , on lordaeron, because my eyes starts to hurt of how outdated that game is.

Here is Synx's warrior's match history:
http://armory.warmane.com/character/.../match-history

Solid 1.4k experience, as a Warrior (one of the easiest and most OP classes, according to himself)

Here's his main:
http://armory.warmane.com/character/...stwolf/profile

Yes, a warlock. Why don't we take a look at arena ladders now:
http://armory.warmane.com/ladder/3v3/Frostwolf

The most bracket around which PvP is "balanced". Let's see hmm...

2 warlocks, 1 warrior in top 10.
10 warlocks in top 50 (that's 20% for those following along)...
We see our first hunter in the ladder at rank 50.

Isn't that interesting. The easiest, and most OP class doesn't have a single player in the top 50 (excluding the 50th rank). I wonder what the reason for that could be. But wait there's more.

In all the Blizzcon's hosted, there has only been one Hunter that has won.

http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/14730483387

They played PhD (One could argue this was partly because DK's were ****ing op, but I digress).

You would think that if Hunters were so easy and OP in MoP, they would have won Blizzcon for it, but nope. LSD reigned dominant.

So Synx, please stop talking out of your *** and do some research. Feel free to play Hunter here and get a feel for it in 3v3. Then you'll come to realize just how **** they actually are.

[Ataxes]

☐ Not rekt
☑ Rekt

[Synx7]

Going to just point out Synx's experience in terms of PvP.

Here is Synx telling everyone how op Prot Warrior is in LK... with a shadowmourne




Here is Synx's warrior's match history:
http://armory.warmane.com/character/.../match-history

Solid 1.4k experience, as a Warrior (one of the easiest and most OP classes, according to himself)

Here's his main:
http://armory.warmane.com/character/...stwolf/profile

Yes, a warlock. Why don't we take a look at arena ladders now:
http://armory.warmane.com/ladder/3v3/Frostwolf

The most bracket around which PvP is "balanced". Let's see hmm...

2 warlocks, 1 warrior in top 10.
10 warlocks in top 50 (that's 20% for those following along)...
We see our first hunter in the ladder at rank 50.

Isn't that interesting. The easiest, and most OP class doesn't have a single player in the top 50 (excluding the 50th rank). I wonder what the reason for that could be. But wait there's more.

In all the Blizzcon's hosted, there has only been one Hunter that has won.

http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/14730483387

They played PhD (One could argue this was partly because DK's were ****ing op, but I digress).

You would think that if Hunters were so easy and OP in MoP, they would have won Blizzcon for it, but nope. LSD reigned dominant.

So Synx, please stop talking out of your *** and do some research. Feel free to play Hunter here and get a feel for it in 3v3. Then you'll come to realize just how **** they actually are.

I love the attention u gave me. Let's clear some **** up.
"Solid 1.4k experience, as a Warrior (one of the easiest and most OP classes, according to himself)"
I did arenas only to cap my guild mates. that rating was done in less than 1 hour and half of capping 472 ilvl guildies. Come up with a better proof that "i suck". Notice the dates and assume by urself what was my ilvl back then. Around 502-505 , beating the **** out of everyone who were 522. Yes, indeed, the easiest class in MoP and the most op . Or you're just another warrior main that has to defend his beloved hardest class to play.
And don't compare this ****ty realm of MoP with 0 attention given, with retail.
Second, i don't even give a **** about ratings in MoP, mostly because they don't matter. Why shall I get 2200 or more , only to get a ****ty tabard and a red weapon enchant? no thanks. In cata it had some usefulness , 410 ilvl gear.

"The most bracket around which PvP is "balanced". Let's see hmm...

2 warlocks, 1 warrior in top 10."

Not really sure if you could go up with this comp in retail.
Do some more research about me , honestly , I feel good that a loser has the time to look up at my stats. Just for you, i don't take arenas seriously especially 2v2. I just do arenas to reach the weekly cap, nothing else. Nothing else to DO in this 0 content realm , than weekly capping , 2-3 bgs and thats it.
"Going to just point out Synx's experience in terms of PvP.

Here is Synx telling everyone how op Prot Warrior is in LK... with a shadowmourne"
I started to play WoW just about when Cata got released, never really played WotLK and never will, for the sole reason that the game is too outdated in comparison with cata/mop/etc. I started when wow was modern, not when old , so i can't bring myself to play that. And the prot warrior with Smourne thing, again, my speculation. I only heard about that weapon. Wasn't interested to get information about that **** because i wasn't interested about it.
And "yes, a warlock". talking like the class is broken op or some sort. Maybe it is, as destro , since its the easiest caster spec around and does ****load of dmg. I don't feel it as well when playin Affliction, mostly.
Soon, my main will be a warrior as soon as he's 522 , OR if they will ever realease 5.4.8 , 550.
Later on, my alt will be either a hunter or mage. More like mage , at least it got some complexity compared to huntard faceroll.
Now piss off from where you've crawled from