View Poll Results: Would you like multiboxing to be allowed?

Voters
950. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes.

    268 28.21%
  • No.

    682 71.79%
  1. You can bring me this video where you do it all without any help from external software automatically replicating and transmitting orders to multiple clients too. If there's no automation, alt+tabbing a dozen times simply to move your characters from A to B should be trivial, yes?
    LOL, just run the clients in VM's, assign input methods in VM, make macros ingame. I admit it will be a simple setup but it will run from A to B and be able to attack mobs no problem.

    I could also start using wooden sticks and tape. Zero automation.


    "alt+tabbing"
    The year 2004 called, they want their alt+tab buttons back.
    Comments like these make it clear that you know very little about multiboxing, all clients are ran in borderless windowed mode for over a decade now.

  2. Yes it would be legal because no botting is involved. Finally somebody understood the definition of botting!
    The fact that you don t get sarcasm and the extremely paradoxical actions I just described in that post, clearly show your level of conscience regarding the clean and functional way to work of a video-game and the respect for the community of players.
    I'm sorry to say that your mentality is not different from a hacker mentality at all.


    http://forum.warmane.com/showthread....s-or-no/page32
    Edited: October 4, 2015

  3. The fact that you don t get sarcasm and the extremely paradoxical actions I just described in that post, clearly show your level of conscience regarding the clean and functional way to work of a video-game and the respect for the community of players.
    I'm sorry to say that your mentality is not different from a hacker mentality at all.
    I understood ur sarcasm but it doesnt change the fact that it wouldnt count as botting.

  4. I understood ur sarcasm but it doesnt change the fact that it wouldnt count as botting.
    I never said "botting". I showed you an apocalyptical event that could destroy the videogame industry and you are only able to reply with: bot bot! legally legally! /clap
    Thera are many things in this world which are legal but can destroy the world. If was for ppl like you, the planet heart would be burn out in a matter of 10 years from now.
    Thats why your mentality is a selfish and oportunistic hacker mentality.


    http://forum.warmane.com/showthread....s-or-no/page32
    Edited: October 4, 2015

  5. Hatefull and toxic discussions, like this one right here, is more likely to forbid multiboxing, rather than allow it.

    Think about it for a while.


    PS : At this point, i don't know why a moderator hasn't stepped in to ....moderate ?

  6. Because people are bantering, arguing and defending their positions over a subject that very few people are actually neutral about. It's expected that discussions might get heated, and both sides have so far managed to keep their attacks at an acceptable level. If you don't see a Moderator stepping in to moderate, it's because there has been nothing crossing the line so far. There are eight of us, one would have intervened.

  7. Because people are bantering, arguing and defending their positions over a subject that very few people are actually neutral about. It's expected that discussions might get heated, and both sides have so far managed to keep their attacks at an acceptable level. If you don't see a Moderator stepping in to moderate, it's because there has been nothing crossing the line so far. There are eight of us, one would have intervened.
    Any reason why my posts needed to be pre-approved by a moderator last night? And why was it denied?

  8. We multiboxers also try to be visually entertaining. :)
    Let multiboxers play.




  9. We multiboxers also try to be visually entertaining. :)
    Let multiboxers play.
    Only you have fun with those things. The normal guys look at you and think: "Why is this crap allowed?"


    http://forum.warmane.com/showthread....s-or-no/page32
    Edited: October 4, 2015

  10. You do realize that works both ways, right?

    "Why should players be limited on having to play with multiboxers on every server? Why shouldn't players have access to one without, when they have all other servers to multibox in?"

    There's nothing ridiculous about the poll, when you take into perspective that multiboxing is the "odd" part here. Claiming that it's "like asking multiboxers if everyone should multibox" is the actual ridiculous comparison. On other servers there's the justification that they usually generate a nice amount of donations to get all characters geared, but that isn't likely to be true on Lordaeron.

    If there's something unfair about this poll it's just the fact everyone knew the result even before it was started. Multiboxing is a very polarizing topic, and few people really don't care one way or another. The rest ends up being multiboxers and a few others being for it (surprise, surprise), the vast majority wanting each character having a different player behind it.
    I've either not stated my point well, or you've miss understood sir. I wasn't saying the poll was ridiculous, i was saying asking us if you should make everyone box is ridiculous. which IS in my opinion like asking everyone that doesn't box if it should be allowed, which of course they will say no.

    Maybe i should have stated " should ganking be allowed, which i feel is a more accurate comparison, seeing as a player of much lower level has about as much chance defeating at level 80 as a single player does as defeating my 10 box team ( which can happen if favorable circumstances exist) in any case what you said kinda sounds like you put up with us cause we donate a lot which isn't always the case.

    Obnoxious same as always, quick to write something down, lol either you meant it or not. i might have taken that out of context, like you did my statement.

    In any case I "most likely" wont be playing on it, as the thought of leveling up at a 1x rate isn't appealing to me at all. however if it is allowed i would like the option. guess that should get a (surprise, surprise) too. I would like the option to play as i choose.

  11. I've either not stated my point well, or you've miss understood sir. I wasn't saying the poll was ridiculous, i was saying asking us if you should make everyone box is ridiculous. which IS in my opinion like asking everyone that doesn't box if it should be allowed, which of course they will say no.

    Maybe i should have stated " should ganking be allowed, which i feel is a more accurate comparison, seeing as a player of much lower level has about as much chance defeating at level 80 as a single player does as defeating my 10 box team ( which can happen if favorable circumstances exist) in any case what you said kinda sounds like you put up with us cause we donate a lot which isn't always the case.
    And what exactly would be wrong in everyone who doesn't multibox wanting one server where they can be assured there will be none of it? It's like saying "this poll is unfair because I know my side will lose." What does it says if people don't even want a poll because they know it will show the vast majority of players doesn't wants something?

    Using ganking will be an accurate comparison the moment you start using outside software to do it. While it's one person going against another person, even if with equipment or level superiority, it remains fair game in a server flagged as PvP.

  12. And what exactly would be wrong in everyone who doesn't multibox wanting one server where they can be assured there will be none of it? It's like saying "this poll is unfair because I know my side will lose." What does it says if people don't even want a poll because they know it will show the vast majority of players doesn't wants something?

    Using ganking will be an accurate comparison the moment you start using outside software to do it. While it's one person going against another person, even if with equipment or level superiority, it remains fair game in a server flagged as PvP.
    No, i feel your wrong. but i guess its just my opinion, i wont change yours, nor you mine. Your statements sir about we're only tolerated because we donate make me never want to donate again. you really shouldn't say things like that.

    But i will say this, your opinions is indeed yours to have. and by all means please state it, but saying us respecting "the staff" isnt optional is true, however basic understanding of human nature and your logic of fear will control is accurate, however it isnt really respect you'll get when you talk to people like that, its just fear of reprisal. which isnt real respect at all. Respect is earned sir.

    What do u think why ppl make such a drama about multiboxing?
    No, its not because it affects their daily game experience.
    Its because they got killed by a multiboxer and are raging and want to do everything to harm the boxer.
    In addition its because of their lack of knowledge about multiboxing. I read frequently that multiboxing is some kind of bot, hack, cheat and what not and that it doesnt take any effort to do it.

    I see complains that come out of rage and ignorance as baseless.[/QUOTE]

    This Sums up this whole debate^^^^^^
    Edited: September 30, 2015

  13. Yes, it's not that people dislike having to deal with blatantly unfair advantages.
    It's all because they don't understand multiboxers. Multiboxers are the new minority - oppressed, persecuted, misunderstood.

    What's the link for the multiboxer tumblr?

  14. Yes, it's not that people dislike having to deal with blatantly unfair advantages.
    It's all because they don't understand multiboxers. Multiboxers are the new minority - oppressed, persecuted, misunderstood.

    What's the link for the multiboxer tumblr?
    Snide comment as always sir, you never let me down.

    Well time for me to let this topic die, it affects me minimally. your record of snappy come backs to try and make people see "your" point of view and how stupid they are for having a different one" remains in "tact" sir.

    Bravo.

  15. Snide comment as always sir, you never let me down.

    Well time for me to let this topic die, it affects me minimally. your record of snappy come backs to try and make people see "your" point of view and how stupid they are for having a different one" remains in "tact" sir.

    Bravo.
    I would have to say his 'snide comment' shouldn't come as a shock. You are trying to sum all of our arguments up as 'Rage from being killed by Mboxers' despite our best efforts to give actual reasons as to why we don't want Mboxing. If you belittle a group of people by making out we know nothing of a subject in question and speak no logic and just fueled by rage and anger then expect snide comment in return.
    Imo Obnoxious was quite tame using that low amount of sarcasm and your post deserved something that 'cut a bit deeper'.

First ... 18262728293038 ... Last

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •