Lordaeron Server review video - Dodgykebaab

[tyrisflare]

There we go everyone, hope you enjoy it. I'll be here to answer any questions.

[DarkenedHue]

Good review. Overwhelmingly positive, even though you didn't gloss over the parts of the server that could still use patching up. You also nicely captured a lot of the elements that give it its appeal.

[thebotz]

Kek'd at the "Leeroy Jenkins" and both you and your healer getting absolutely erased from existence the millisecond shockwave worn off.

Yup, encounter reset on wipe is a part of dungeon/boss scripting that's just as important as the actual encounter. Lost count of the amount of servers that failed to remember that and ended up with certain bosses behaving differently every attempt.

[saghha]

OMG!!!!!!!!!!! I saw myself in this video, that is soooooooooo wicked!!! Woot! I ran with Dodgyreviewer through N. Gundrak and he kept pulling so fast that I couldn't keep my mana up, lol. Even those he was geared, he still needed heals, but insisted on pulling more and more without giving my a chance for mana until the end he finally gave me a mana break.

>< Funny how you treat your fellow Alliance members like they're working in a sweat shop, Dodgy!

#REKT

Anyways, it was still a good time and great review Dodgy, thank you for your time and I still had a blast.

[Zenjuro]

top kek at the mage "bug" well what to expect from this clicking keyboard turner.
"I set up times for raiding" tfw he spammed us and then didnt show up
But I guess the review was suprisingly positive and that means more players, I hope so

[Craazy]

He dindt review arena :(((

[LikeDwind]

I like the review, I don't know who is this doggykebab but the video if very good and funny :P

[bloodshedsword]

18:00 ..... :))

[Zelta]

Haters, please avoid the thread. Constructive criticism and discussion are allowed, pure hate and arguing are not (as with any other forum thread).

[saghha]

Haters, please avoid the thread. Constructive criticism and discussion are allowed, pure hate and arguing are not (as with any other forum thread).

Just curious, what guidelines, rules, etc do you use to decide if someone is arguing or discussing? I'm not trying to tempt fate or anything, i'm just genuinely curious as an avid forum go'er.

One could say that one might know the rules, but one doesn't not fully understand the rules.

[Zelta]

Just curious, what guidelines, rules, etc do you use to decide if someone is arguing or discussing? I'm not trying to tempt fate or anything, i'm just genuinely curious as an avid forum go'er.

One could say that one might know the rules, but one doesn't not fully understand the rules.

Generally, I am lenient towards that, and if I am ever in doubt I simply let it go or ask for other moderator's opinion. But in this occasion it was clear that the thread was going out of control, of which I will not go into details. Feel free to PM me if you want to know more about this or our moderating in general.

[romz]

I'm actually pretty satisfied that DodgeyKebaab wasn't bias against the realm.

[saghha]

Generally, I am lenient towards that, and if I am ever in doubt I simply let it go or ask for other moderator's opinion. But in this occasion it was clear that the thread was going out of control, of which I will not go into details. Feel free to PM me if you want to know more about this or our moderating in general.

Nope, you answered wonderfully and thank you for your time. I do really appreciate it.

[saghha]

I'm actually pretty satisfied that DodgeyKebaab wasn't bias against the realm.

^ This ^

Not to mention that over all the staff seems to be treating him fine and vice versa, so I don't see an issue here.

[Ruffruff]

was he paid for this video by warmane as well? JW since "no hate" is allowed.