Thank you! Glad to see you didn't miss the whole point of the comparison.
Yes, because currently PvP and PvE on WoD are not unbalanced and equally braindead spamfests. Right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfxPZZ6fmNE
No need. The argument is strong enough as it is. You don't get it though.
For comparison, GW2 has 7 million, Hearthstone currently has +40 million, LoL has 67 million.
Yes, because by making that choice they can get the same results with far less effort. Which is. Exactly. What. Dumbing down. Means.
The cash cow called "World of Warcraft" ran dry some 2-3 years ago. Now they're just beating it dead and sucking it dry until the entire player base abandons the product, and the company with it. I'm not gonna play Overwatch because there are FAR far better FPSers than that, HotS is trash defined, Diablo III is nothing anymore, Hearthstone is a casual game, Starcraft II is something they're paying slightly more attention to than Wacraft IV.
Seems to me that you're just defending Blizzard's awful decisions over the last years and justifying the whole watering down of the game. If that's so, then you just have no place in this discussion.There is NOTHING that Blizzard did well in the last several years. Nothing. I am not saying that vanilla was perfect - that it offered balanced PvP and PvE. But I am saying that I'd rather play vanilla than anything post-Cata, and that's only because of the class development on Cata - probably the only good thing for the whole expansion, besides X-mog (lol). MoP is just laughable and WoD is so casual I feel like I'm playing a facebook game or something. Damn, even facebook games are harder than WoD.